Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Biological Procedures Online

Fig. 2

From: Chicken chorioallantoic membrane as a reliable model to evaluate osteosarcoma—an experimental approach using SaOS2 cell line

Fig. 2

a. Quantification of angiogenic response of SaOS2 cells on CAM. Angioquant prune images of CAM incubated with 20 μl volume of 3 × 105, 6 × 105 and 12 × 105 cells along with DMEM alone as negative control at 0 and 96 h of incubation. Images taken at 0 and 96 h of incubation were subsequently analyzed by Angioquant software. All three volumes of SaOS2 cells shows numerous scattered allantoic vessels at the chorioallantoic layer of CAM (d, f, and h) compared to control. Red line indicated the presence of blood vessels around the sponge. Images are representative of 3 set of experiments. b. SaOS2 cells are able to induce the growth and sprouting ability of vessels on CAM. Total length, size and number of junctions of the blood vessels were measured using Angioquant software from the images taken at 0 and 96 h of incubation. Growth of the vessels was confirmed by measuring the length and size of the vessels and sprouting ability by means of measuring the number of vessels junctions. All three volumes of cells shows comparatively significant increase in the length (Graph A), size (Graph B) and number of vessels junction (Graph C) at 96 h of incubation. The value at 0 h considers as one for all cases. Experiments were performed in triplicate and data presented as mean ± SEM, p = < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.010 versus control, n = 3

Back to article page