Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 ELISA and the serological diagnosis of CCHFV

From: Recent Advances in Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Detection, Treatment, and Vaccination: Overview of Current Status and Challenges

Method type

Detection Target (segment)

Comparison with reference

Characteristics

REF

Sandwich ELISA (sELISA)

Nucleoprotein (NP)

RT-PCR

High sensitivity and specificity, identification of CCHFV virus in people, ticks, and culture supernatant, large-scale sample screening in resource-constrained settings

[118]

Recombinant ELISA

(Rec-ELISA)

Recombinant NP / Mucin-like variable domain

(rNP/rMLD)

RT-PCR

High sensitivity and specificity

[126]

Indirect ELISA

(iELISA)

(rNP)

In-house iELISA and VectoCrimea CHF IgG ELISA kit

Sensitivity, specificity, repeatable in diverse sets of situations, safe, stable, and scalable

[127]

Competitive ELISA

(cELISA)

rNP

Sera from CCHFV-endemic locations was previously described using an adapted commercial ELISA.

Large-scale screening, test species independently, high sensitivity and specificity

[128]

Double-antigen sandwich ELISA (DA- ELISA)

NP

Species-adapted VectorBest ELISA and Euroimmun IFA

Highly sensitive and specific, testing several different species at the same time, minimizing the false-positive

[129]

Immune complex (IC) ELISA and µ-capture ELISA

NP

IgM/IgG indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) testing

in-house and commercially accessible IgM/IgG ELISA assays

Sensitivity, specificity, and ease of use are all advantages of producing viral antigens in high quantities in E. coli without needing a cost-effective eukaryotic expression system or native virus rearing.

[130]