Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Biological Procedures Online

Fig. 5

From: Differences in Fatty Acid Metabolism between MCDD and HFD Induced Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease Model Mice

Fig. 5

The expression of proteins and mRNA in the liver of mice in each group. (A-B) Western blot results for FAS, ACC1, SREBP-1c in liver samples. (C) FAS gene levels of liver samples were measured through qRT-PCR, and normalized against β-actin level. Data were expressed as the means ± SD. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. MN group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs. HN group. FC, fold change, model-to-normal group ratio. MN, standard chow diet; MCDD, methionine-choline-deficient diet; HN, standard chow diet; HFD, high-fat diet

Back to article page

Biological Procedures Online

ISSN: 1480-9222

Contact us